ISSN : 2663-2187
-
Can Combination Therapy Improve Outcomes in PDE5i-Refractory Erectile Dysfunction? A Systematic Review of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
Volume 8 | Issue - 8
-
Influence of Storage Temperature on the Bond Performance of Universal Adhesives: A Narrative Review
Volume 8 | Issue - 8
-
Effects of direct acting antivirals(DAAs)on cryoglobulinemia in patients infected with hepatitis C virus
Volume 8 | Issue - 8
-
Effect of Education Sessions About Plastic Usage Hazards and Its Safe Disposal on Knowledge and Reported Practice of Female Employees at Port Said University: A Pre–Post Intervention Study
Volume 8 | Issue - 7
-
Soil Quality Under a Cocoa-Based Agroforestry System With Associated Indigenous Tree Species In The Department Of Divo (Cote d’Ivoire)
Volume 8 | Issue - 7
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIFFERENCE IN THE RATE OF INDIVIDUALCANINE RETRACTION IN MAXILLARY ARCH FOLLOWINGMICROOSTEOPERFORATION WITH TWO DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Orthodontic tooth movement is a time-consuming process that can be a concern for both patients and practitioners. Micro Osteoperforation is an emerging technique that may accelerate tooth movement by inducing localized alveolar microtrauma. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Micro Osteoperforation using Temporary Anchorage Devices and Bone Drilling Bur on the rate of canine retraction in the maxillary arch.
