Volume 6 | Issue -15
Volume 6 | Issue -15
Volume 6 | Issue -15
Volume 6 | Issue -15
Volume 6 | Issue -15
Background: This study was conducted to assess the prevalence of class 2 malocclusion and edentulism in a known population and its treatment using various appliances and Implant and Fixed prosthesis. Material and methods: This study was conducted to assess the prevalence of class 2 malocclusion and edentulism in a known population and its treatment using various appliances and Implant and Fixed prosthesis. There were total 100 participants in this study. the subjects had been informed about the procedure and were asked for consent. All the subjects agreed to give consent and hence all of them were included in the study. All the subjects underwent oral clinical examination and were checked for edentulism and class 2 malocclusion. The findings had been tabulated. Various myofunctional appliances were fabricated for class 2 malocclusion participants and for the ones with edentulism, implant prosthesis and fixed prosthesis were planned. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Results: In this study there were 100 subjects of which 45 were male and 55 were female. The prevalence of class II malocclusion was 63%. The prevalence of edentulism was 18%. Activator was fabricated for 25 subjects, Herbst appliance was given in 21 subjects, Jasper Jumper appliance was made for 10 subjects and Frankel II appliance was made for 7 subjects. Implant prosthesis was made for 11 subjects and fixed prosthesis was made for 8 subjects. Conclusion: The prevalence of class II malocclusion was 63%. The prevalence of edentulism was 18%. Most of the subjects were female. Appliances like activator, Herbst appliance, Jasper jumper appliance and Frankel II appliance were fabricated for subjects with class II malocclusion and implant prostheses and fixed prostheses were planned for edentulism subjects.