During the emergence and development of theology, the scholars held differing opinions. Some supported the field, considering engagement in theology permissible as long as one's obligations were not neglected. Others opposed the study of theology, viewing it as contrary to divine law and even forbidding association with theologians, labeling them as innovators. This debate and criticism surrounding theology contributed to its examination and definition, eventually establishing it as an independent discipline with its methods, Various opinions exist regarding the legitimacy of theology, and three main tendencies can be identified: The first tendency was vehement opposition and rejection of theology, with proponents explicitly condemning it and warning against its adoption in their writings. Those who held this view considered theology intertwined with religious matters and criticized those who engaged in it, labeling them innovators. Imam Al-Shafi'i is among those associated with this position, as expressions of his condemnation of theology and its proponents have been reported. Verbal evidence was viewed as a tool used by speakers to articulate their beliefs and knowledge acquired through reason or transmission, to substantiate their claims, to refute opponents' accusations, or to address inconsistencies resulting from conflicting statements. It indicates that Imam Al-Shafi'i sought to critique verbal evidence, considering its structure and purpose. Contrary to the first tendency, which rejected theology comprehensively, followers of the second tendency emphasized its necessity and the need to pay attention to it as an essential obligation or a sufficient pursuit. One prominent advocate of this view is Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari, who discusses the benefits of engaging in theology in his treatise "Istiḥsān al-Khawḍ fī 'Ilmal-Kalām" . Supporters of the third tendency argue for a balanced approach, separating the praise and condemnation of theology. Imam Al-Ghazali was a prominent figure in this group