‘Media Trial' normally refers to a exercise where the media starts offevolved a separate investigation and forms a public opinion against the accused earlier than the real trial commences. in this manner, it prejudices the trial main to infringement of the rights of the accused. hence, the accused, who ought to be considered harmless till tested guilty, is now presumed guilty, violating his fundamental rights. the topic ‘Media Trial’ has been discussed with the aid of civil rights activists, constitutional legal professionals, judges, and academicians almost each day nowadays. With the upward push within the net and social media customers, the quantity of exposure any crime or suspect or accused gets in the media has reached alarming proportions. Innocents may be condemned for no cause, or those who are responsible won't get a honest trial and grow to be getting a higher sentence than what they deserve. the fact that the media is considered the fourth pillar of democracy, and below Article 19(1)(a) of the charter of India, it has a right to freedom of speech; however, the media can not be allowed to head past its area under the garb of freedom of speech and expression to the extent of prejudicing the trial. consequently, when the rights of equal weight conflict, courts ought to evolve balancing strategies or measures based on re-calibration under which both the rights are given equal area inside the constitutional scheme. Envisage for a second a state of affairs in which in an individual is accused of having devoted an offense. there is a whole dismiss for the statistics of the case. problems aren't allowed to be raised, arguments which can be not often advanced in court, and manner of law that doesn't exist.